Reasons for the Honda-Nissan Merger Failure and Potential Future Outcomes

      The prospect of a partnership between Honda and Nissan seems conclusively off the table. Their brief engagement lasted less than two months, leaving Nissan in a precarious position as it searches for a partner to help stabilize its operations. Reports suggest that Nissan's pride may have contributed to the breakdown of talks with Honda, rendering it susceptible to influences from outside the automotive sector.

      According to multiple sources cited by Reuters this week, discussions faltered when Honda realized that Nissan was neither making sufficient progress nor taking essential steps to secure its future. In November, Nissan forecasted a drastic 70% decrease in operating profit for 2024. While the company made cuts, including 9,000 jobs and a salary reduction for CEO Makoto Uchida, Honda perceived Nissan’s reluctance to close additional plants as a lack of willingness to negotiate. Conversely, Nissan was concerned that further downsizing would undermine the value of their potential partnership.

      In January, Honda came to the conclusion that acquiring Nissan, rather than merging, was the most sensible path forward. The idea of Nissan becoming a subsidiary was unacceptable to Nissan; such a scenario had not been part of their plan a month earlier, causing significant offense to its executives. Sources indicated that Honda's proposal was seen as a demeaning slight against Nissan, a company with a longer history in the automotive industry.

      Fast forward to February, when reports surfaced that Uchida met with Honda CEO Toshihiro Mibe to formally end the negotiations. Notably, electronics giant Foxconn, which previously sought a deal with Nissan last year before the Honda discussions became public, is now back in talks. However, Foxconn's Chairman Young Liu made it clear that their goal is not to purchase shares but to foster cooperation. This marks Foxconn’s first public comment on its intentions regarding Nissan. It appears that Nissan is open to hearing Foxconn's proposals, particularly since Jun Seki, a former Nissan executive, now leads Foxconn’s electric vehicle division.

      Renault will also play a significant role in Nissan's future, possessing a 36% stake in the company. The French automaker has expressed a desire to reduce its stake to 15%, as both brands, once unified under former CEO Carlos Ghosn, aim to untangle their operations. Should Foxconn—or any other parties—seek more than mere cooperation, they will need to engage with Renault.

      Amid these developments, unverified reports suggested that the Japanese government was instrumental in bringing Honda and Nissan together, aiming to bolster the nation's automotive industry against increasing competition from China. An analyst had previously stated that the government aimed to coordinate efforts to strengthen the sector. The recent failure of this partnership may have disappointed Tokyo, although it remains unclear what direction the government wishes for Nissan to take moving forward. By rejecting the deal, Nissan indicates a preference for assistance that does not compromise its control. Even with recent challenges, Nissan remains a recognized brand, but longevity and reputation alone are inadequate in an era where the car manufacturing landscape is undergoing significant changes.

      If you have any insights, feel free to send them to [email protected]