‘Heavy D,’ the influencer from Diesel Brothers, has been released from jail and is excited to share his story.

      @heavydsparks on Instagram and YouTube, stock.adobe.com, edited by the author

      The most important car news and reviews, no nonsense.

      Subscribe to our free daily newsletter to receive the stories that truly matter straight to your inbox each weekday.

      Last week, David “Heavy D” Sparks, one of the notable figures from the Diesel Brothers on YouTube and Discovery Channel, was arrested for failing to pay approximately $850,000 in fees connected to a Clean Air Act lawsuit. After spending three days in jail, he had a hearing in which a judge ordered his immediate release.

      When this news first broke, it appeared he was simply ignoring criminal fines, but that wasn’t entirely correct.

      Sparks shared his version of events in an Instagram video (embedded below), mentioning that he would provide more details in an upcoming video on his YouTube channel. He clarifies, which we can corroborate through additional coverage and court documents, that he wasn’t avoiding fines from a government agency—he was evading responsibilities related to legal fees from a civil lawsuit filed by a private group, the Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment (UPHE).

      He referred to his release as “vindication,” a statement I’m not fully inclined to agree with—but then, I wasn’t the one in jail.

      After reviewing some documents and updates, here’s the latest on this situation:

      This began when the UPHE sued the Diesel Brothers for breaching the Clean Air Act by creating emissions-deleted diesel trucks. A court sided with the physicians' group, so the fees involved weren’t direct fines from a government body; Sparks was ordered by a judge to pay after UPHE won its initial case, which he failed to do. This led to his arrest.

      In a hearing on Thursday, Sparks’ attorney, Cole Cannon, argued that “he was arrested not for a crime, but for a paperwork dispute.” While a paperwork dispute can certainly be a crime, the judge ruled that Sparks didn’t need to be jailed for this particular disagreement, thus his immediate release was ordered.

      The specific outcome regarding what Sparks may still owe in relation to this issue hasn’t been revealed yet.

      The UPHE claims that emissions-deleted diesel vehicles emit more than 30 times the toxins of a standard truck. Sparks and his team assert that they have only manufactured a handful of such deleted trucks, primarily for display purposes. The main argument for his release appears to focus on the fact that the fees he was avoiding were related to legal costs, not a criminal fine.

      In his video, Sparks argues that the physician’s organization sought an excessively large sum for emissions violations, damaging his reputation by prolonging the lawsuit.

      While I can’t say Sparks deserves imprisonment, I believe both parties are pursuing their objectives through legal technicalities. Here’s my take, based on the publicly available information:

      Sparks claims that the UPHE aimed to “drag his name through the mud” with their lawsuit, asserting that their monetary demands were solely for attorney fees and not penalties owed to the government for infractions.

      I don’t see why that second point is significant—if he was ordered to pay a specific amount by a judge, that’s the decision, regardless of the intended use of the funds. However, I concur that the UPHE’s main goal was likely more focused on raising awareness than recovering a particular amount of money.

      Sparks mentioned that the fees were disproportionately high, stating he was sued for “$114 million,” which he called “absurd,” given he only owned “20 trucks, mostly limited-mileage, off-road vehicles,” translating to “$5 million per truck.”

      Nonetheless, one aspect that hasn’t been acknowledged is that while the Diesel Brothers may only own 20 trucks, Sparks personally has nearly 4.5 million subscribers on YouTube, 3.8 million followers on Instagram, along with other social media platforms, and starred in a mainstream TV show for several years. It’s reasonable to assert that his videos and influence have contributed to coal-rolling behaviors nationwide, though quantifying that would be challenging.

      The Diesel Brothers maintain a well-known, somewhat confrontational online presence, so while Sparks has every right to be upset about being seen as a symbol of emissions violations, it’s not surprising that he ended up in that position.

      In the end, I suspect there will be some undisclosed settlement reached, allowing Sparks to continue his activities.