This Vintage Vehicle Crumpled Like Paper During The Same Crash Test As Its Contemporary Successor | Carscoops

      A harsh crash test comparing an old Golf with its contemporary version highlights the safety deficiencies of past vehicles.

      Dekra analyzed a Golf from the 1980s alongside the current model to showcase significant safety improvements.

      A 40 mph collision could be deadly in the Golf II, while the latest Golf VIII would likely allow survivors.

      There have also been considerable advancements in braking, handling, and lighting technology.

      It's widely acknowledged that modern cars prioritize safety much more than those from previous generations, but the contrast becomes striking in direct comparisons. German testing organization Dekra recently conducted a dramatic test between a late-1980s VW Golf II and the current Golf VIII, putting both vehicles through several assessments to demonstrate the evolution of vehicle safety over the last 35 years.

      As expected, the results were bleak for the older model. In a 64 km/h (40 mph) offset frontal crash test—the same method used by Euro NCAP until 2020—the Golf II crumpled like a tin can.

      The test utilized a deformable barrier that mimics the energy absorption of another vehicle, effectively simulating a head-on collision between two identical cars traveling at approximately 50 to 55 km/h (31 to 34 mph). Under these circumstances, the cabin of the Golf II collapsed, pushing the steering wheel dangerously into the interior, resulting in an almost zero chance of survival for its occupants.

      In contrast, the modern Golf VIII emerged from the same test with its structure intact. Crumple zones, airbags, and advanced seat belts absorbed the shock, protecting passengers inside. Dekra accident researcher Markus Egelhaaf observed that, in such a crash, occupants of the new Golf would likely escape with only minor injuries.

      Braking Performance Redefined

      Braking showcased another stark generational difference. Even though the 35-year-old Golf was meticulously maintained, it could not compete with the stopping performance of the latest model. Dekra reported that the modern Golf consistently stopped about 30 percent sooner than the older vehicle across various tests, which were performed at different speeds and road conditions.

      Handling has also improved significantly. During a double lane-change test simulating swerving around an obstacle, the Golf II approached the brink of losing control at 65 km/h (40 mph), whereas the Golf VIII handled it smoothly at 75 km/h (47 mph). The advancements in chassis and suspension played a crucial role, reducing the front dip during the maneuver.

      However, Egelhaaf noted that modern technology does have its limits: "This test drive made it clear that even with current technology, there are thresholds beyond which a skid cannot be avoided."

      Improving Illumination

      Lastly, Dekra compared the lighting systems of the two VW hatchbacks. The yellowish halogen lights from the '80s appear outdated next to the bright white LEDs of today's models, which illuminate the road nearly as well as daylight. Additionally, the modern LED taillights and the required third brake light significantly increase the visibility of the new Golf at night.

      Egelhaaf concluded the comparison by underscoring the broader implications: “Overall, the tests highlighted the advancements achieved in vehicle safety over the past 35 years.” He also warned that as technology continues to progress, regulations must ensure that safety innovations remain a priority rather than allowing them to take a backseat to infotainment and smartphone integration.