Florida Drivers May Now Face Jail Time Simply for Speeding Under New Legislation | Carscoops

      Florida’s new speeding legislation introduces jail time and court requirements, but critics argue it is overly broad and could burden the court system.

      The legislation focuses on drivers exceeding the speed limit by 50 mph or more and those driving 100 mph or above in a dangerous manner. This new law follows the tragic death of an 11-year-old pedestrian killed by a speeding driver in 2022.

      As of July 1, Florida is tightening regulations on speeding drivers, potentially requiring some to serve jail sentences. Signed by Governor Ron DeSantis, the law aims to enhance road safety but has raised concerns that it could further complicate an already strained legal system, with assertions that the law is excessively broad.

      The new rules apply to motor vehicles exceeding the posted speed limit by at least 50 mph, as well as to those operating their vehicles at 100 mph or more in a way that endangers individuals or property. First-time offenders may face penalties of up to a $500 fine, 30 days in jail, or both.

      Those caught a second time could incur a $1,000 fine, face up to 90 days in jail, or both. Furthermore, repeat offenders could have their licenses revoked for up to a year. Drivers caught exceeding the speed limit by 50 mph or more are also required to appear in court, as mandated by the new Florida legislation.

      The law's impetus was the death of 11-year-old Anthony Reznick, who was killed in 2022 when struck by Samentha Toussaint, who had previously amassed over two dozen traffic citations, had a suspended license, and was driving 85 mph in a residential area without her headlights. Despite these circumstances, she did not face any criminal charges; her license was revoked for eight years, and she was sentenced to perform community service and pay a fine.

      Concerns about the court implications of this law have been raised by State Republican Mike Gottlieb, who opposes the legislation. He argues that it lacks careful consideration.

      “It’s constitutionally overbroad,” he stated, according to WFLA. “It is incredibly invasive. It’s going to clog our court systems in a way that none of us can imagine. The bill makes sense—speeding kills, and we want to impose harsher penalties for speeding. However, its execution and consequences need to be reevaluated. I suggest we reconsider this and bring it back in the next session. It’s not a sound bill, and its current form is not ideal.”