Honda's 2026 Prelude Might Be Faster Than You Imagine | Carscoops

      A viral video has caused quite a stir among enthusiasts, but early timing runs often don't reveal the full picture, particularly when the driver employs the least effective technique.

      The viral test indicated a sluggish 8.28-second acceleration from 0 to 60 mph for the new Prelude.

      Inaccurate launch methods and simulated gear changes distorted the test results.

      In contrast, a Japanese test recorded a time of 7.2 seconds using the correct hybrid launch technique.

      Since the arrival of the new Prelude, which carries a hybrid badge and offers only 200 hp (203 PS), Honda enthusiasts have been questioning whether that power is sufficient.

      This week, the AeroflowDynamics YouTube channel shared the first 0 to 60 mph test of a US-spec Prelude, clocking an unimpressive 8.28 seconds. This sparked alarm, disappointment, and even joyful comments from Type R fans.

      But before we jump to conclusions and accuse Honda of ruining another cherished memory, we must understand how professional acceleration testing operates.

      The validity of this particular video is comparable to contrasting this year's more affordable Thanksgiving bundle from Walmart with last year's pricier, more bountiful offering.

      How Reliable Are These Tests?

      To start, the driver used the Prelude’s simulated gearshift mode, a feature designed to mimic actual gear shifts in the hybrid powertrain. While entertaining, it is certainly less efficient than allowing the engine to operate naturally, even if that results in a lamentable, constant engine sound akin to a malfunctioning generator.

      Evidence? A Japanese video employing the correct launch method—building torque against the brake without using the paddles, allowing the hybrid system to function independently—documented a time of 7.2 seconds to reach a non-GPS-verified 62 mph (100 km/h). Interestingly, the same driver had recorded a much slower 9.1-second time just days prior, immediately following delivery of the vehicle.

      Although that figure still doesn't place it in Type R territory, no one expected it to achieve such numbers given the power specifications.

      Importance of Break-in

      However, even the 7.2-second result warrants some skepticism. The US tester’s Prelude had just 66 miles on the odometer, while the Japanese model had completed 699 miles (1,125 km) at the time of testing. It's well-documented that vehicles typically perform better after some use, even if by mere tenths of a second.

      While modern manufacturing has minimized the need for extensive break-in periods, many manufacturers still advise a brief break-in, and adaptive ECUs often improve as the vehicle accumulates miles.

      That being said, conditions can vary depending on the model and manufacturer. As noted by Jason Fenske from Engineering Explained, the second-generation Acura NSX was delivered with its engine already broken in.

      Other Influential Factors

      In my previous experiences as a road tester for Autocar.co.uk, I recorded 8-second and 6.5-second runs for seemingly identical Seat Leon Cupra Rs, attributing the difference to mileage and fuel octane ratings on the faster vehicle.

      Several external factors that professional testers consider, which we don’t know in this case, include altitude, road conditions, tire and air temperatures, as well as wind speed and direction.

      Additionally, it is worth noting that the two runs were timed in only one direction rather than being averaged from two runs in opposing directions, and they weren’t measured using precise GPS technology to determine when the wheels started turning and actual speed.

      Thus, the viral 8.28-second run should not be taken as the final judgment. While it reflects the speed most owners can expect, the ultimate figure will be lower and will only be revealed following thorough testing by automotive publications.

      The 6.2 seconds achieved by Car and Driver in a Civic Hybrid sedan with a similar weight and identical 200 hp hybrid powertrain (excluding the virtual shifts) serves as a more reliable benchmark.

      Although Car and Driver accounts for a 0.3-second rollout deduction, even when adjusted for that, the results suggest that the Prelude has greater potential than the initial YouTube impression indicates.

      Beyond 0-60 Times

      Regardless of its performance under ideal conditions, the Prelude's acceleration figures are unlikely to excite anyone in an era dominated by 4- and 5-second hot hatches, particularly not at a price point of $42,000, let alone the $60,000 markups seen from dealers looking to profit.

      However, it would be unjust to critique the entire vehicle solely based on its performance in this singular metric, which offers limited insight into overall vehicle performance. Just ask any Miata owner.

      The best approach is to take the Prelude for a test drive and determine for yourself if the Type-R suspension components compensate for its less athletic feel in straight-line performance compared to the Type R.